EM Reflections – June 2020

Thanks to Dr Joanna Middleton for leading the discussions this month

Edited by Dr David Lewis 


Discussion Topics

  1. Antiviral Toxicity

    • Always adjust dosing in patients with renal impairment
  2. Necrotising Fasciitis

    • Difficult clinical diagnosis
    • Should be on the differential for all soft tissue infections
    • Delayed definitive care always results in poor outcomes
  3. Epidural Abscess

    • Thorough detailed neurological examination required
    • Isolated leg weakness is rare in Stroke
    • Progressive development of symproms and mixed UMN/LMN signs suggests spinal cord compression.

 


Antiviral Toxicity

Case

A 70yr old male presents with a typical zoster rash in the left L1 dermatome. He has a past medical history of chronic renal insufficiency. He is started on Valacyclovir 1000mg TID. He represents 3 days later with hallucinations including a feeling that he was occupying a dead body. What is the differential diagnosis?


 

Varicella Zoster Encephalitis vs Valacyclovir Toxicity

VZV and antiviral toxicity can present with similar symptoms

Two main risk factors increase the risk for VZV

  • age greater than 50 years old
  • immunocompromised due to reduced T cell-mediated immunity

The main risk factor for antiviral toxicity is renal insufficiency

Differentiation

  • Timing
    • Toxicity presents within 1-3 days of starting drug (vs 1-2 weeks)

 

  • Symptoms – both can present with confusion and altered LOC
    • Encephalitis – fever, HA, seizures, more likely with Trigeminal nerve (V1) or disseminated zoster
    • Toxicity – Visual hallucinations, dysphasia, tremor/myoclonus
    • Toxicity – Cotard’s syndrome…

Cotard’s Syndrome

“le délire des négations”

(delirium of negation)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotard_delusion

  • Described in 1880 by neurologist Jules Cotard
    • “patient usually denies their own existence, the existence of a certain body part, or the existence of a portion of their body”
  • Seen in schizophrenia, psychosis and…
  • ….acyclovir toxicity (felt to be due to metabolite CMMB (9-carboxymethoxymethylguanine) crossing BBB)

Further Reading

Varicella Zoster Encephalitis case report and outline

Valacyclovir Toxicity case report and outline

Cotard’s Syndrome

Drug Dosing in Chronic Kidney Disease

 

 

 


Necrotising Soft Tissue Infections (NSTI)

Case

A 28yr old female presents pain, redness and swelling over the right thigh. She has a past medical history of type 2 diabetes. She is managed as an outpatient with intravenous ceftriaxone q24hrs. Her symptoms failed to respond on follow up. What is the concern now? Are there any red flags? What condition needs to be considered in patients with soft tissue infections that fail to respond to antibiotics?


NSTI first described by Hippocrates 5th century BC

“[m]any were attacked by the erysipelas all over the body when the exciting cause was a trivial accident…flesh, sinews, and bones fell away in large quantities…there were many deaths.”

 

Necrotizing fasciitis is characterized by rapid destruction of tissue, systemic toxicity, and, if not treated aggressively, gross morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and aggressive surgical treatment reduces risk; however, it is often difficult to diagnose NF, and sometimes patients are treated for simple cellulitis until they rapidly deteriorate.

Infection typically spreads along the muscle fascia due to its relatively poor blood supply; muscle tissue is initially spared because of its generous blood supply.

Infection requires inoculation of the pathogen into the subcutaneous tissue or via hematogenous spread.

Classification

  • Type 1 – polymicrobial – older/diabetics/EtOH/IC/PVD
  • Type 2 – monomicrobial – usually group A beta-hemolytic strep (often hematogenous) – healthy people of all ages

Early signs and symptoms of NSTI are often identical to those seen with cellulitis or abscesses potentially making the correct diagnosis difficult

‘Classic’ Signs / Symptoms

(1) the presence of bullae
(2) skin ecchymosis that precedes skin necrosis
(3) crepitus
(4) cutaneous anesthesia
(5) pain out of proportion to examination
(6) edema that extends beyond the skin erythema
(7) systemic toxicity
(8) progression of infection despite antibiotic therapy or rapid progression

First 4 are “hard” signs

  • Erythema (without sharp margins; 72 percent)
  • Edema that extends beyond the visible erythema (75 percent)
  • Severe pain (out of proportion to exam findings in some cases; 72 percent)
  • Fever (60 percent)
  • Crepitus (50 percent)
  • Skin bullae, necrosis, or ecchymosis (38 percent)

Streaking lymphangitis favours the diagnosis of cellulitis over necrotizing fasciitis

Diagnosis

  • There is no set of clinical findings, lab test results and even imaging that can definitively rule out necrotizing fasciitis
    • “Surgical exploration is the only way to establish the diagnosis of necrotizing infection”.
    • “Surgical exploration should not be delayed when there is clinical suspicion for a necrotizing infection while awaiting results of radiographic imaging other diagnostic information”
  • But what if you really aren’t sure?  Or if you get pushback?
  • CT is probably the best test – esp Type 1 (gas forming)
    • Findings – gas, fluid collections, tissue enhancement, inflammatory fascial changes
  • Finger test…
    • “After local anesthesia, make a 2-3 cm incision in the skin large enough to insert your index finger down to the deep fascia. Lack of bleeding and/or “dishwater pus” in the wound are very suggestive of NSTI. Gently probe the tissues with your finger down to the deep fascia. If the deep tissues dissect easily with minimal resistance, the finger test is + and NSTI can be ruled in.”  (emergencymedicinecases.com)
  • But what about PoCUS????

PoCUS

Diagnosis of Necrotizing Faciitis with Bedside Ultrasound: the STAFF Exam

Findings – “STAFF”

ST – subcutaneous thickening
A – air
FF – fascial fluid

Ultrasound video demonstrating Subcutaneous Thickening, Air, and Fascial Fluid (STAFF).

 

Soft tissue ultrasound findings are significantly different when compared to normal soft tissue ultrasound

Bottom Line: Limited data, but basically PoCUS is not sufficient to rule-in or rule out, but might be helpful in raising suspicion level for necrotising fasciitis for physicians who routinely scan all soft tissue infections.

 

LRINF Score

The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) Score: A Tool for Distinguishing Necrotizing Fasciitis From Other Soft Tissue Infections

Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) Score.  2004, retrospective – score >6 negative predictive value of 96.0% and a positive predictive value of 92%.

 

A validation study looking only at patients with pathology-confirmed necrotizing fasciitis showed that a LRINEC score cutoff of 6 points for necrotizing fasciitis only had a sensitivity of 59.2% and a specificity of 83.8%, yielding a PPV of 37.9% and NPV of 92.5%. However, the study did show that severe cellulitis had a LRINEC Sscore ≥ 6 points only 16.2% of the time.  Therefore, the available evidence suggests that the LRINEC score should not be used to rule-out NSTI.

Bottom Line: Doesn’t rule-out…… or rule-in

 

Suggested Algorithm – UpToDate

 

EM Cases Review

BCE 69 Necrotizing Fasciitis

 

Further Reading

Necrotizing fasciitis – Can Fam Physician. 2009 Oct; 55(10): 981–987.

 


Epidural Abscess

Case

A 40yr old female presents with left leg weakness. She has a complex recent past medical history including recently diagnosed pneumonia, previous renal colic and type 2 diabetes. Could this be a stroke? What are the other causes of leg weakness? How does the examination differentiate UMN from LMN lesions? When considering a diagnosis of epidural abscess what investigation is required? How soon should it be performed?


Only 4% of Strokes present with isolated or predominant leg weakness. (Brain. 1994 Apr;117 ( Pt 2):347-54.
doi: 10.1093/brain/117.2.347)

Common mechanisms of weakness:

  • Upper motor neuron lesions (Stroke, Tumour, Spinal Cord Compression, etc)
  • Lower motor neuron lesions ( Neuropathy, Disc Prolapse, Spinal Cord Compression, etc)
  • Neuromuscular junction lesions (Myasthenia, etc)
  • Neuropathies (Guillain-Barre, etc)
  • Muscle (Myopathies, etc)

Full review on Muscle Weakness from the Merck Manual here

Weakness that becomes severe within minutes or less is usually caused by severe trauma or stroke; in stroke, weakness is usually unilateral and can be mild or severe. Sudden weakness, numbness, and severe pain localized to a limb are more likely caused by local arterial occlusion and limb ischemia, which can be differentiated by vascular assessment (eg, pulse, color, temperature, capillary refill, differences in Doppler-measured limb BPs). Spinal cord compression can also cause paralysis that evolves over minutes (but usually over hours or days) and is readily distinguished by incontinence and clinical findings of a discrete cord sensory and motor level.

Unilateral upper motor neuron signs (spasticity, hyperreflexia, extensor plantar response) and weakness involving an arm and a leg on the same side of the body: A contralateral hemispheric lesion, most often a stroke

Upper or lower motor neuron signs (or both) plus loss of sensation below a segmental spinal cord level and loss of bowel or bladder control (or both): A spinal cord lesion

 

Epidural Abscess

Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a severe pyogenic infection of the epidural space that leads to devastating neurological deficits and may be fatal. SEA is usually located in the thoracic and lumbar parts of the vertebral column and injures the spine by direct compression or local ischemia. Spinal injury may be prevented if surgical and medical interventions are implemented early. The diagnosis is difficult, because clinical symptoms are not specific and can mimic many benign conditions. The classical triad of symptoms includes back pain, fever and neurological deterioration.

Spinal Epidural Abscess: Common Symptoms of an Emergency Condition – A Case Report

 

  • 75% are a delayed diagnosis
    • Usually hematogenous spread, usually S. aureus
  • Diagnosis
    • CRP has an sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 50%
    • MRI is gold standard
    • CT with contrast 2nd choice

 

Further Reading

Spinal epidural abscess

Episode 26: Low Back Pain Emergencies

 

 

Continue Reading

EM Reflections – May 2020

Thanks to Dr Paul Page for leading the discussions this month

Edited by Dr David Lewis 


Discussion Topics

  1. Seizure disorder and safe discharge 

    • Consider risk factors for adverse outcome of discharge for all patients with recurrent seizure disorder
    • Use a checklist
  2. Competency and Capacity

    • Multidisciplinary consultation is paramount in deciding capacity
    • Special circumstances include vulnerable adults and pregnancy
  3. Testicular Torsion

    • Time = Testicle viability
    • Do not delay definitive management

Seizure disorder and safe discharge 

Case

A patient presents with recurrent seizures. They have a past medical history of schizophrenia and mental health delay. Following appropriate ED management with complete resolution of seizures and full recovery of the patient – what is the recommended disposition?


Seizure disorder is a common presentation to the Emergency Department. This EM Cases post provides an excellent summary for the ED approach to resolved seizures:

Ep 132 Emergency Approach to Resolved Seizures

 

ED approach to resolved seizures – Summary pdf


In this study – Ethanol withdrawal or low antiepileptic drug levels were implicated as contributing factors in 177 (49%) of patients. New‐onset seizures were thought to be present in 94 (26%) patients. Status epilepticus occurred in only 21 (6%) patients.

73% of patients were discharged.

 

 

 


Disposition

Most authors recommend admission for patients presenting with FIRST Seizure Episode. Patients with a past medical history of recurrent seizure disorder are more likely to be discharged than admitted.

However – this EBMedicine article cites an incidence of 19% seizure recurrence rate within 24 hours of presentation, which decreased to 9% if patients with alcohol related events or focal lesions on CT were excluded. They suggest, that at present, there is insufficient evidence to guide the decision to admit. They recommend this decision be tailored to the patient, taking into consideration the patient’s access to follow-up care and social risk factors (eg, alcoholism or lack of health insurance). Patients with comorbidities, including age > 60 years, known cardiovascular disease, history of cancer, or history of immunocompromise, should be considered for admission to the hospital.

 

Considerations For Safety On Discharge

Patients and their families should be counseled and instructed on basic safety measures to prevent complications (such as trauma) during seizures. For example, patients should be advised to avoid swimming or cycling following a seizure, at least until they have been reassessed by their neurologist and their antiepileptic therapy optimized, if needed. A particularly important point for seizure patients is education against driving. Although evidence remains controversial on this issue, there is general agreement that uncontrolled epileptic patients who drive are at risk for a motor vehicle crash, with potential injury or death to themselves and others. For this reason, most states do not allow these patients to drive unless they have been seizure-free on medications for 1 year. According to population survey data, 0.01% to 0.1% of all motor vehicle crashes are attributable to seizures


Competency and Capacity

Case

A young female patient with a history of polysubstance drug abuse presents with a psychotic episode. She refuses treatment. What are the competency and capacity implications? She is also pregnant. Does this change the the competency and capacity implications?


This LitFL post provides and excellent outline for Competency and Capacity in the ED:

Capacity and Competence

This article published by the RCPSC provides a useful outline from a Canadian perspective – with the following objectives.

  1. To clarify the role of decisional capacity in informed consent
  2. To discuss problems associated with decisional capacity and addiction

RCPSC – Decisional Capacity

 


 



Capacity in Pregnancy

Recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

On the basis of the principles outlined in this Committee Opinion, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College) makes the following recommendations:

  • Pregnancy is not an exception to the principle that a decisionally capable patient has the right to refuse treatment, even treatment needed to maintain life. Therefore, a decisionally capable pregnant woman’s decision to refuse recommended medical or surgical interventions should be respected.
  • The use of coercion is not only ethically impermissible but also medically inadvisable because of the realities of prognostic uncertainty and the limitations of medical knowledge. As such, it is never acceptable for obstetrician–gynecologists to attempt to influence patients toward a clinical decision using coercion. Obstetrician–gynecologists are discouraged in the strongest possible terms from the use of duress, manipulation, coercion, physical force, or threats, including threats to involve the courts or child protective services, to motivate women toward a specific clinical decision.
  • Eliciting the patient’s reasoning, lived experience, and values is critically important when engaging with a pregnant woman who refuses an intervention that the obstetrician–gynecologist judges to be medically indicated for her well-being, her fetus’s well-being, or both. Medical expertise is best applied when the physician strives to understand the context within which the patient is making her decision.
  • When working to reach a resolution with a patient who has refused medically recommended treatment, consideration should be given to the following factors: the reliability and validity of the evidence base, the severity of the prospective outcome, the degree of burden or risk placed on the patient, the extent to which the pregnant woman understands the potential gravity of the situation or the risk involved, and the degree of urgency that the case presents. Ultimately, however, the patient should be reassured that her wishes will be respected when treatment recommendations are refused.
  • Obstetrician–gynecologists are encouraged to resolve differences by using a team approach that recognizes the patient in the context of her life and beliefs and to consider seeking advice from ethics consultants when the clinician or the patient feels that this would help in conflict resolution.
  • The College opposes the use of coerced medical interventions for pregnant women, including the use of the courts to mandate medical interventions for unwilling patients. Principles of medical ethics support obstetrician–gynecologists’ refusal to participate in court-ordered interventions that violate their professional norms or their consciences. However, obstetrician–gynecologists should consider the potential legal or employment-related consequences of their refusal. Although in most cases such court orders give legal permission for but do not require obstetrician–gynecologists’ participation in forced medical interventions, obstetrician–gynecologists who find themselves in this situation should familiarize themselves with the specific circumstances of the case.
  • It is not ethically defensible to evoke conscience as a justification to attempt to coerce a patient into accepting care that she does not desire.
  • The College strongly discourages medical institutions from pursuing court-ordered interventions or taking action against obstetrician–gynecologists who refuse to perform them.
  • Resources and counseling should be made available to patients who experience an adverse outcome after refusing recommended treatment. Resources also should be established to support debriefing and counseling for health care professionals when adverse outcomes occur after a pregnant patient’s refusal of treatment.

Further Reading:

Ethically Justified Clinically Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of the Depressed Pregnant Patient

How Do I Determine if My Patient has Decision-Making Capacity?

 


Testicular Torsion

Case

A 12 year old boy presents with scrotal discomfort in the early hours of the morning. The department is very busy and the waiting time to be seen is 4 hours. What triage category is this presenting complaint? If a diagnosis of torsion is considered, how quickly should definitive management be initiated?


Ramachandra et al. demonstrated through multivariate analysis of the factors associated with testicular salvage, that duration of symptoms of less than 6 h was a significant predictor of testicular salvage. They found that the median duration of pain was significantly longer in patients who underwent orchiectomy versus orchidopexy. Similar findings were seen with respect to time to operating room from initial presentation. They concluded that time to presentation is in fact the most important factor in determining salvageability of the testicle in testicular torsion. If surgical exploration is delayed, testicular atrophy will occur by 6 to 8 h, with necrosis ensuing within 8 to 10 h of initial presentation. Salvage rates of over 90% are seen when surgical exploration is performed within 6 h of the onset of symptoms, decreasing to 50% when symptoms last beyond 12 h. The chance of testicular salvage is less than 10%, when symptoms have been present for over 24 h

Factors influencing rate of testicular salvage in acute testicular torsion at a tertiary pediatric center.

Ramachandra P, Palazzi KL, Holmes NM, Marietti S

West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan; 16(1):190-4.

[PubMed]

 

 

This study (Howe et al). confirmed the relationship between duration of torsion and testicle viability and also found a relationship between the degree of torsion


 

 

AAFP Review of Testicular Torsion: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Ear Foreign Body Removal

Ear Foreign Body Removal

Resident Clinical Pearl (RCP) May 2020

Dr. Sultan Alrobaian (PEM Fellow and Dalhousie PoCUS Fellow, Saint John, NB, Canada)

Reviewed by Dr. David Lewis


Introduction

  • Most patients with ear Foreign Bodies (FB) are children, adults can also present with ear FB
  • The most common objects removed include beads, pebbles, tissue paper, small toys, popcorn kernels, and insects
  • Diagnosis is often delayed because the causative event is usually unobserved or the symptoms are nonspecific
  • Most of the patients with ear FBs were asymptomatic at presentation, other patients presented with otalgia, bleeding from the ear, otorrhea, tinnitus, hearing loss, a sense of ear fullness or symptoms of otitis media
  • Successful removal depends on several factors, including location of the foreign body, type of material and patient cooperation
  • Visualization of a foreign body on otoscopy confirms the diagnosis, the other ear and both nostrils should also be examined closely for additional foreign bodies.

Clinical Anatomy

© 2020 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


Equipment

  • Multiple options exist for removal of external auditory canal foreign bodies
  • Which piece of equipment to use will be influenced by the type of FB, the shape of the FB, the location of the FB and the cooperativeness of the patient

Timing

  • The type of foreign body determines the timing for removal
  • Button batteries, live insects and penetrating foreign bodies warrant urgent removal

Indications for consultation or referral to a specialist

  • Button battery
  • Potentially penetrating foreign bodies
  • Foreign body with evidence of injury to the external ear canal (EAC), tympanic membrane, middle ear, vestibular symptoms or marked pain

Technique


1 – Irrigation

  • This technique is used for small inorganic objects or insects
  • Irrigation is often better tolerated than instrumentation and does not require direct visualization
  • Contraindicated in patients with tympanostomy tubes, perforated tympanic membranes or button battery because the potential for caustic injury.
  • An angiocatheter or section of tubing from a butterfly syringe
  • Using body temperature water, retract the pinna, and squirt water superiorly in the external auditory canal, behind the FB

© 2020 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


2 – Instrumentation under direct visualization

  • Instrumentation can be painful and frequently warrants procedural sedation in young children or other uncooperative patients
  • General anesthesia may be required to ensure safe removal
  • Restrain if needed for safety

  • Commonly used pieces of equipment are curettes, alligator forceps, and plain forceps. Other equipment options include using a right angle hook, balloon catheter, such as a Fogarty catheter

  • Used in conjunction with the operating head of an otoscope
  • The pinna should be retracted, and the FB visualized
  • When using forceps, the FB can be grasped and removed

  • Both curettes and right angle hooks should be gently maneuvered behind the FB and rotated so the end is behind the FB, which can then be pulled out

© 2020 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


3 – Suction

  • This should be performed with a soft suction tipped catheter that has a thumb controlled release valve
  • Insert the suction against the FB under direct visualization and then activate the suctions and remove the FB

© 2020 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.


4 – Cyanoacrylate

  • Apply a small amount of cyanoacrylate or skin glue to the blunt end of a cotton-tipped applicator
  • Insert it against the FB under direct visualization and hold in place until the glue dries
  • Slowly and carefully withdraw


5 – Insect removal

  • The first step is to kill the insect with mineral oil followed by lidocaine
  • Once the insect is neutralized, it can be removed by any of the above methods


SUMMARY

  • Foreign bodies of EAC frequently occur in children six years of age and younger
  • Patients with foreign bodies of the EAC are frequently asymptomatic
  • Button batteries , penetrating foreign bodies or injury to the EAC should undergo urgent removal by an otolaryngologist.
  • With adequate illumination, proper equipment, and sufficient personnel, many EAC foreign bodies can be removed

REFERENCES

1.Lotterman S, Sohal M. Ear Foreign Body Removal. [Updated 2019 Jun 5]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459136/

2.https://www.uptodate.com

3.Heim S W, Maughan K L. Foreign bodies in the ear, nose, and throat. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(08):1185–1189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4.Awad AH, ElTaher M. ENT Foreign Bodies: An Experience. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;22(2):146–151. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1603922

Continue Reading

Ten Best Practices for Improving Emergency Medicine Provider-Nurse Communication

 

On behalf of all our Emergency Physicians, we want to thank the most valuable asset we have….. our super-skilled, resourceful, caring ……. ER Nurses

 

How can we improve our communication?


 

Thanks to Dr. Mekwan for recommending this article

 

Communication between nurses and emergency medicine (EM) providers is critical to the safe and effective care of patients in the emergency department. Understanding interactions and information needs among clinical team members can not only aid in communication, but can also provide a framework for training and the design of workflow and health information technology systems.

 

Top Ten Best Practices for Improving Communication in the ED

 

  1. Communicate diagnostic assessment, plan of care and disposition plan to other team members as early as possible. Update the team of any changes to the plan.
  2. Communicate pending tasks in the patient’s care as well as information regarding changes or holdups to tasks or orders.
  3. Communicate details regarding proactive diagnostic testing and therapeutic interventions (e.g. placing IV and drawing bloodwork prior the physician evaluation in patients with abdominal pain, obtaining urine HCG in women of childbearing age).
  4. Don’t assume everyone has a shared understanding: recognize that you might have unique access to information and make sure that it is shared in a timely manner.
  5. Notify providers of any critical or unexpected changes in vital signs or patient status. Did the patient develop new tachycardia, fever, or hypotension? Is the patient more somnolent or getting more agitated?
  6. Do not assume electronic orders substitute for verbal communication.
  7. Use asynchronous communication for lower priority items to aid in prioritization (e.g. leaving a note for a physician requesting they sign-off on non-urgent orders).
  8. Adapt communication strategies based on team members’ experience level and existing relationships. For example, a new nurse may need extra time and guidance while orienting.
  9. Adapt communication strategies to the physical layout of the ED, especially in those facilities where nurses and physicians may have workstations out of sight from one another or where it is not obvious which staff members are on different care teams.
  10. Use strategies that exploit provider experience level regardless of role hierarchy. Perhaps we all remember being a fresh resident physician (finally a doctor!) and realizing that we knew very little compared to the seasoned charge nurse.

 


 

 

 

Continue Reading

Deep Dive Lung PoCUS – COVID 19 Pandemic

SJRHEM Weekly COVID-19 Rounds – May 2020

Dr. David Lewis


 

 

Part One covers aspects of core and advanced aspects of lung ultrasound application including: Zones, Technique, and Artifacts

Part Two covers PoCUS in COVID, the recent research, PoCUS findings, Infection Protection and Control, Indications and Pathways.


Part 1

 


Part 2

 

Continue Reading

COVID-19 Testing in New Brunswick

COVID Journal Club Rounds – April 2016

Dr Jo-Anne Talbott


Key Questions

  • Who should we test for COVID
  • Who can we test with the Rapid COVID test
  • What is the sensitivity and specificity of the tests
  • What are the rates of positive tests in New Brunswick
  • Will we move to testing serum for IgG, IgM

RT-PCR Test

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test

ID Microbiologists at the George Dumont used  recommended processes to develop a test for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in upper and lower respiratory specimens

Their results were validated by the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg, Manitoba


Rapid COVID Test

  • Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay is performed on the GeneXpert platform
  • Rapid test used in SJRH Microbiology Lab
  • Clinically suspected COVID-19 in
    • patient currently in the ICU or being admitted to the ICU
    • pregnant patient currently in labour and being admitted
    • your clinical judgement a rapid test is required
  • Call Microbiology MD

Full Presentation

Download (PDF, 19.97MB)

Continue Reading

COVID-19 – SJRH and New Brunswick

This post is provided as an information resource specifically for HealthCare Professionals within the Saint John Region and New Brunswick Emergency Departments

This post is updated regularly

SJRHEM COVID-19 Pages


COVID-19

New Brunswick Public Health – Link

Trauma New Brunswick Program

WorkSafe New Brunswick


Academic Activity – Dal, DMNB, Residents, News, Cancellations


Staff Wellness

 


What is COVID-19

  • A novel betacoronavirus first reported in Wuhan, China on December 31st 2019
  • Symptoms for the novel coronavirus are similar to those for influenza or other respiratory illnesses.
  • New Brunswick Case Definition – see below– Note this continues to evolve
  • Current assumptions are that spread is via droplet and/or fomite to face
  • Infection Prevention and Control = Contact and Droplet precautions

COVID-19 – SOURCES OF INFORMATION

SJRHEM GRAND ROUNDS

 


SJRHEM Activity During the Pandemic


NB Health Screening Tool and Referral forms to Community Assessment Centres – 27 May 2020 

For community referral for COVID-19 screening and testing:

Referral Form – Combined Referral and Order Form

FAX Number = 506 462-2040

 


Horizon Screening Questions – May 29

Download pdf

 


Self-Isolation Information Leaflet for Patients

Self-Isolate and Alternative Self-Isolate Leaflet

Self Management COVID

 

 


 

COVID-19 Testing – Public Health Advice and Viral Swabs 

Summary of Current Guidance (May 26)

“Every New Brunswicker should remain vigilant,” said Dr. Jennifer Russell, chief medical officer of health. “Please continue to limit your close contacts to prevent the chance of spreading the virus, especially to those who are more vulnerable to complications of COVID-19. Although community transmission has not been confirmed, it is important to be aware that it remains a possibility.”

Up-to-date information about COVID-19, including the latest data on confirmed cases and laboratory testing in New Brunswick is available online.

New Brunswick is currently in Phase 3 (Yellow) of the COVID-19 recovery. Information on public health recovery phases, measures and guidelines is available online.

Dr. Jennifer Russell, chief medical officer of health, announced that testing would now be recommended for people exhibiting at least two of the following five symptoms:

  • fever above 38°C or signs of fever;
  • a new cough or worsening chronic cough;
  • sore throat;
  • runny nose;
  • headache:
  • New onset fatigue;
  • New onset muscle pain;
  • Diarrhea;
  • Loss of sense of taste or smell; and
  • In children, purple markings on fingers or toes

Those who are exhibiting at least two of these symptoms are advised to immediately self-isolate and contact 811 or their family physician for further direction. Symptoms can range from relatively mild (runny nose and sore throat) to severe such as difficulty breathing.

Summary of Current Guidance  (April 2):

The COVID-19 pandemic is rapidly evolving around the world and within Canada. At variable points in the last few weeks, many parts of Canada including Quebec have started seeing community transmission. This had led to additional concern and control measures applied to travel outside of the province. In addition, New Brunswick is now also entering the community transmission phase.

Because of these dynamics, we will be transitioning from focusing on identifying cases imported into the province as a control measure to focusing testing priorities in our province on protecting our most vulnerable populations/settings and maintaining critical health system capabilities.

Given this transition, the following are key points when clinically evaluating patients (virtually or in person) and deciding on testing:

  • Conduct a clinical assessment – clinical case definition still includes fever/history of fever and/or new onset/exacerbation of chronic cough. Other symptoms may include headache, sore throat or coryza.
    • Test those with moderate to severe symptoms (such as signs of pneumonia, dyspnea, blood O2 saturation <94%) including those who require hospitalization.
    • Recommend testing patients with risk factors such as age 60 +, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes, and cancer.
    • People living in crowded settings or limited capacity to self-isolate due to same

Assessment centers will be testing all referrals moving forward, and not providing secondary screening, so please ensure referrals have been clinically assessed appropriately, virtually or in person, prior to completing a referral form.

  • Test Priority groups (even with mild symptoms) – to maintain the integrity of the health care system and prevent transmission in clinical and other vulnerable group settings
    • Symptomatic health care professionals, such as physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, laboratory technologists, Ambulance NB, first responders, emergency medical dispatchers, Extra Mural program
    • Staff in hospitals, nursing homes, and other institutional or group living settings with direct patient care/contact
    • Patients/residents in institutional and group living settings with vulnerable populations (including within RHA, long term care, shelters, correctional facilities, adult residential facilities)
  • Consider and inquire about exposure criteria (travel outside New Brunswick or close contact/group exposure setting (ie gathering, work setting), either within the last 14 days), but absence of such no longer excludes a patient from testing. Identification of exposure risks and clusters remains a critical public health strategy in managing COVID-19 even in the context of community transmission.
  • There are no specific directives to NOT test certain individuals or groups of individuals at this time, continue to use your professional judgement but please be aware that the situation may change quickly in the coming days to weeks, depending on capacity.
  • Full Document Here – April 2
  • 5 Hospitals across NB, only SJRH in R2
  • 5 per day of those being discharged
  • 5 per day of those being admitted
  • Use pre labeled ‘sentinel swab’
  • Fever or Cough but NO travel or contact hx

 

How to Collect NP Swab

 


Case Definition – New Brunswick

based on the Canada Public Health  –  NB Interim national case definition  – March 24

Person under investigation (PUI)

A person with fever and/or cough who meets the exposure criteria and for whom a laboratory test for COVID-19 has been or is expected to be requested.

Probable

A person:

  • with fever (over 38 degrees Celsius) and/or new onset of (or exacerbation of chronic) cough
    AND
  • who meets the COVID-19 exposure criteria
    AND
  • in whom laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 is inconclusive,negative (if specimen quality or timing is suspect), or
    positive but not confirmed by the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML)

Confirmed

A person with laboratory confirmation of infection with SARS-CoV-2 as a result of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT).

 

SJRHEM ADVICE – 19 March 2020

Consider any patient who presents with an Influenza Like Illness – irrespective of above case definition as being suspicious for COVID-19 and take appropriate PPE precautions.


Exposure Criteria

In the 14 days before onset of illness, a person who:

  • Traveled to an affected area i.e. anyone who travelled outside New Brunswick. OR
  • Had close contact with a person with acute respiratory illness who has been to an affected area (anyone who travelled outside NB within 14 days prior to their illness onset) OR
  • Had laboratory exposure to biological material (e.g. primary clinical specimens, virus culture isolates) known to contain COVID-19.

Close contact = A close contact is defined as a person who provided care for the patient, including healthcare workers, family members or other caregivers, or who had other similar close physical contact or who lived with or otherwise had close prolonged contact with a probable or confirmed case while the case was ill.


Affected Areas

Public Health Canada Affected Area List

UPDATEAll travel outside New Brunswick


 

 

 

Continue Reading

ADULT Rapid Sequence Intubation and Post-Intubation Analgesia and Sedation for Major Trauma Patients – NB Trauma

Consensus Statement:

ADULT Rapid Sequence Intubation and Post-Intubation

Analgesia and Sedation for Major Trauma Patients

NB Trauma Program – July 2018

Background:

  • Major trauma patients frequently require advanced airway control.
  • Endotracheal intubation is the preferred advanced airway intervention in major trauma patients.
  • Intubated trauma patients also need significant post-intubation pharmacological support.
  • Specifically, these patients require analgesia and sedation. This is particularly true when transfer to another facility is required, during which ICU level support is not available unless transfer occurs via Air Ambulance.
  • In New Brunswick, there is significant variation in the approach to both advanced airway control and post-intubation analgesia and sedation practices for major trauma patients.
  • Physicians in smaller centres in particular have asked for standardized, evidence-based guidance for both Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) and post-intubation pharmacological support in preparation for (and during) ground-based interfacility transfer.
  • Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is a method to achieve airway control that involves rapid administration of sedative and paralytic agents, followed by endotracheal intubation.
  • The purpose of RSI is to affect a state of unconsciousness and neuromuscular blockade, allowing for increased first pass success of endotracheal intubation.
  • Post-intubation analgesia and sedation is a method of controlling pain, agitation and medically induced amnesia for major trauma patients.

 

Consensus Statements:

 

  • A provincially standardized, evidence-based guideline for Rapid Sequence Intubation should be available in all NB Trauma Centres (Appendix A).
  • Similarly, a provincially standardized, evidence-based guideline for Post-Intubation Analgesia and Sedation should be available in the Emergency Department of all NB Trauma Centres (Appendix B).
  • In addition to standardized, evidence-based guidelines, a provincially standardized equipment layout is recommended to optimize the preparation for RSI (Appendix C).
  • Ambulance New Brunswick should ensure consistency with the provincially standardized guidelines for RSI and Post-Intubation Sedation and Analgesia in procedures for Ambulance New Brunswick’s Air Medical Crew.
  • RSI should not be considered or applied for trauma patients who are in cardiac arrest or who are apneic.
  • RSI should not be considered in patients with a predicted difficult airway.
  • RSI should be considered for all trauma patients meeting the following:
    • GCS < 8, quickly deteriorating GCS or loss of airway protection
    • Facial trauma with poor airway control
    • Burns with suspected inhalation injury
    • Respiratory failure
    • Hypoxia
    • Persistent or uncompensated shock (reduction of respiratory efforts)
    • Agitation with possible injury to self or others
    • Potential for eventual respiratory compromise
    • Possible respiratory and/or neurological deterioration during prolonged transport
    • Transport in a confined space with limited resources
  • In addition to the above, RSI Guidelines should include
    • Assessment of the possibility of a difficult intubation
    • Troubleshooting
    • Immediate reference to post-intubation analgesia and sedation
  • In addition to standardized, evidence-based guidelines, a provincially standardized pre-induction checklist is recommended to optimize the preparation for RSI (Appendix D)

 


 

Download (PDF, 885KB)

Continue Reading

A Crushing Case – Compartment Syndrome

A Crushing Case – Compartment Syndrome

Resident Clinical Pearl (RCP) March 2019

Mark McGraw– PGY1 FMEM Dalhousie University, Saint John NB

Reviewed and edited by Renee Amiro and Dr. David Lewis.


Case Part 1

Its early afternoon during your ortho call shift and you get a call from emerge staff saying that they have two patients coming with potentially significant injuries when a piece of equipment rolled over during transport. EMS has informed them that one has a broken ankle. When you arrive to the ED he tells you they are just getting the patient’s pain under control and ordering x-rays.

You head to the room to see the patient, a large burly 35 y/o with an obviously deformed R ankle. His exam is otherwise unremarkable at this time, he has good cap refill to the toes, sensation to the web space, dorsum/plantar and medial/lateral surfaces of the foot is intact and he is able to move his toes. On palpation his lower leg compartments are firm but not hard. An x-ray is done at bedside and shows a Weber Type B fracture of the fibula. His pain seems to be increasing as you speak with him and he has no significant past medical history. He tells you he was loading a piece of equipment when it got away from them and rolled over his leg pinning him momentarily, so he was hanging off a piece of equipment by the leg. Your exam is limited by pain and you ask the nurse if she can give the patient some more pain medication and you’ll return as soon as you see the other patient.


Clinical Pearl: Compartment Syndrome

Compartment Syndrome occurs when the pressure within a muscle compartment exceeds the pressure needed to adequately perfuse tissue. It is considered a true orthopedic emergency and delays in diagnosis and treatment can result in the loss of a patient’s life or limb

Anatomy/Pathophysiology

-Muscle compartments are bound by bone or fascia, two restrictive tissues that create a relatively fixed volume compartment with a very limited ability to compensate for any increase in fluid volume.

-When a traumatic or pathological process results in increased fluid within a muscle compartment the pressure within the compartment increases. This increase in pressure results in reduced arteriovenous pressure gradient (reduced arterial pressure and increased venous pressure) that impairs tissue perfusion within the compartment.

  • As the pressure rises within the compartment capillary flow declines resulting in an enhanced local blood vessel permeability which further increases compartment pressures. If pressures continue to rise tissue ischemia and necrosis will develop.
  • Time for tissue necrosis to occur will vary from patient to patient it can occur in as little as 3 hours and most literature suggests that a fasciotomy must be performed within 4 hours of the onset of ACS to prevent irreversible damage.2

 

 

Signs and Symptoms

Compartment syndrome is a true orthopedic emergency and early recognition of its clinical signs is critical in preventing irreversible tissue damage, rhabdomyolysis, and limb loss.

  1. Pain out of proportion
  2. Pain with passive stretch
  3. Paresthesia
  4. Pain at rest
  5. Paresis

 

  • Severe pain out of proportion to the examination and pain with passive stretching are the first symptoms of ACS to occur. While the early signs are 97% specific for ACS they are only 19% sensitive in the absence of other findings.

  • The combination of pain with passive stretch, paresthesia, and pain with rest has been reported to be 93% sensitive and if paresis is present the sensitivity increases to 98%1. Unfortunately, paraesthesia and paresis are late findings of ACS and delaying the diagnosis until they are present can result in unacceptable delays in treatment. Once a motor nerve deficit has occurred patients will rarely recover function after fasciotomy.

Diagnosis 1

  • Normal compartment pressures are between 8 and 10mmHg in adults and 10-15mmHg in children.
  • 30mmHg is diagnostic for compartment syndrome and should prompt an orthopedic referral when combined with clinical symptoms of compartment syndrome.
  • An alternative is to calculate a differential compartment pressure for an individual patient as factors such as hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and patient medication can cause a large variance in individuals compartment pressures.
  • Differential compartment pressure is calculated by the diastolic blood pressure minus the intra-compartmental pressure if this is under 20mHg then fasciotomy is indicated.
  • If the patient is alert and able to elevate the affected limb, serial examinations over a two-hour period may prevent unnecessary fasciotomies. This should be done in consultation with your orthopedic colleagues.

 

Measuring compartment pressures

Devise: dedicated compartment manometer (Stryker Intra-Compartmental Pressure Monitor) or by using IV tubing and an ART line transducer attached to a long needle.

Who is most at risk of developing compartment syndrome?

  1. Fractures represent 70% of all cases5.
  2. Fractures of the tibial diaphysis account for 40% of all cases in North America.
  3. Open fractures of the tibia are still high risk for compartment syndrome because the opening is insufficient to relieve the compartment pressure associated with the fracture.6

Management of potential compartment syndrome in the ED

  1. Supplemental oxygen if indicated
  2. Remove all cast material, clothing or wraps around the limb
  3. Elevate the limb to the level of the hear
  4. Apply ice to the affected limb if the compartment syndrome is secondary to trauma.
  5. Definitive treatment is a surgical fasciotomy.

 

Case Part 2

You return to see the patient and nursing staff tell you they are unable to get the patients pain under control despite significant amounts of narcotics.

The examination of the lower leg is repeated and the compartments of the leg feel the same however the patient is unable to move his toe. He reports significant pain on passive flexion and extension of the great toe. You call your staff to inform her of the change in the patient and that you are concerned about compartment syndrome and she requests compartment pressure measurements using the Stryker Kit. The senior resident performs the compartment pressure measurements with you and you record pressures of 14, 14 and 25mmHg.

In discussion with the staff you decide to leave the leg on a posterior slab unwrapped, at the level of the heart, and with ice applied 20 on 20 off and perform serial examinations. The serial examinations are unremarkable and the patients pain becomes manageable. The patient is brought to the OR approximately 5 hours later for ORIF of his distal fibula. Compartment pressures are repeated in the OR and were 12, 10, 32 mmHg. An ORIF is performed and you perform serially examinations on the patient q1h overnight. The patient is discharged the following day


Case Follow Up

The patient had significant leg pain on discharge and subsequently presented to the ED on POD#7 for significant leg swelling. Ultrasound was performed to rule out DVT and the patient was discharged for follow up in clinic. He did not go on to develop any further complications.


 

Bottom Line

Compartment syndrome is an important not to miss diagnosis. It should be considered in any hard to control limb pain, especially when associated with fracture.


 

References

  1. 1.Duckworth, A. D., & McQueen, M. M. (2017). The Diagnosis of Acute Compartment Syndrome: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Reviews, 5(12), e1. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00016
  2. Long, B., Koyfman, A., & Rdms, M. G. (2019). Clinical Review. Journal of Emergency Medicine, (December 2018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.021
  3. McQueen, M. M., & Court-Brown, C. M. (1996). Compartment monitoring in tibial fractures. The pressure threshold for decompression. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 78(1), 99–104.
  4. McQueen, M. M., Duckworth, A. D., Aitken, S. A., Sharma, R. A., & Court-Brown, C. M. (2015). Predictors of Compartment Syndrome After Tibial Fracture. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 29(10), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000347
  5. Stella, M., Santolini, E., Sanguineti, F., Felli, L., Vicenti, G., Bizzoca, D., & Santolini, F. (2019). Aetiology of trauma-related acute compartment syndrome of the leg : A systematic review. Injury, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.047
  6. Strohm, P. C., & Su, N. P. (2004). Acute compartment syndrome of the limb, 1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.04.009
Continue Reading

An approach to the unexpected pregnancy

Resident Clinical Pearl (RCP) – March 2019

Renee Amiro – PGY2 FMEM Dalhousie University, Saint John NB

Reviewed by Dr. David Lewis

 

As Emergency Physicians we perform a number of pregnancy tests on women of childbearing age presenting to our care. It is an important part of our practise to screen for life threatening conditions like ectopic pregnancy and also avoid giving medications or preforming investigations that could be harmful to a fetus.

As with any medical test that we do, there are sure to be surprise results that we, or the patients, were not expecting.

A positive BHcG is not always a positive result for a patient we are treating. It is important as medical providers to handle this situation in an empathetic way and be armed with information to help the patient with this potentially life changing information.

An approach to an unexpected pregnancy result:


1. Ensure that the patient either has a support person with them, or if they wish, is alone. This is still confidential information and should be treated as such.
2. After informing the the patient of the pregnancy test result, it can be helpful to assess whether this is a wanted pregnancy. This can help you to assess what information you are going to provide her.
3. If it is an unwanted/surprise pregnancy it is helpful to inform her of her options.
      a. Continue the pregnancy to term
      b. Abortion
      c. Adoption


Since continuing with the pregnancy and adoption will be a long-term navigation and not necessarily time sensitive these discussions are better carried out in primary care / family practice. However, the options for pregnancy termination that are available in Canada and specifically New Brunswick are time sensitive.

It is crucial that patients who are considering these options be provided with accurate and timely information about their legal choice to end a pregnancy. Physicians who are unable to provide this information, for whatever reason, are expected to pass this responsibility on to a physician who can in a time sensitive manner.

Abortion options available in Canada:

 


Information for Patients considering termination of pregnancy


Surgical Abortion:
Abortion is decriminalized. There is no actual legal limit on the gestational age on which abortions can be performed.
Most intuitions in Canada have their own gestational age cut offs and the majority of abortions done in Canada are before 20wks.
The early on in the pregnancy generally the safer the procedure.

Advantages: once you’ve had the procedure it is done.
Disadvantages: you have had to have a d&c (dilation and curettage) and although relatively safe, there are always risks associated with surgical procedures.

 

Medical Abortion:
Medications used are Mifepristone and Misoprostol.
Mifepristone blocks progesterone which is a hormone responsible for maintaining a pregnancy.
Misoprostol is a medication taken up to 48 hours after the mifepristone and causes uterine contractions that empty the uterus.
The process is often described as like having a really heavy and crampy period.
Advantages: No surgical procedure, so can be done in your own home.
Disadvantages: more prolonged, may require more follow up with physicians, can’t be done past 9 weeks.

In New Brunswick: the drug can only be obtained with a prescription from a doctor who has completed the six-hour training required to prescribe it. It’s unclear how many New Brunswick doctors have the training.
You must have a valid health card and an ultrasound showing your gestational age to have the drug covered by the province.

 

Options available in New Brunswick:

Clinic 554 (Fredricton NB)
Able to self refer
Phone Number 506-261-7355
Patients can expect a 5-10-minute intake appointment over the phone.
Counselling, ultrasound and doctor’s exam are all done in the same visit as the abortion so you would only have to travel once.
Surgical are preformed up to 15wks and 6days.
Medical up to 9 weeks.
Cost between 700-850$ for surgical abortion.
Medical abortions are free.

Bathurst Chaleur Regional Hospital (Bathurst)
Able to self refer
Phone number 506-544-2133
Surgical abortions are available up to 13wks 6days.
Hospital based surgical abortions are free of charge.

Dr. Georges Dumont University Hospital Center (Moncton) – French
Able to self refer
Phone number 506-862-2770
Surgical abortions are available up to 13wks and 6days.
Hospital based surgical abortions are free of charge.


The Moncton Hospital- English
Able to self refer
Phone number 1-844- 806- 9205
Surgical abortions are available up to 13wks and 6days.
Hospital based surgical abortions are free of charge.
For options available in every province in Canada please see this list:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/list-abortion-clinics-canada.pdf

 

Copyedited by Dr. Mandy Peach

Continue Reading

What’s the word? Insertion of Word catheter for Bartholin’s cysts

Resident Clinical Pearl (RCP) February 2019

Renee AmiroPGY3 FMEM Dalhousie University, Saint John NB

Reviewed by Dr. David Lewis. Copyedited by Dr. Mandy Peach

Bartholin gland are located in the vulva and are a common cause of vulvar masses.
The normal function of the Bartholin gland is to secret mucus to lubricate the vagina. These ducts can get blocked and cause fluid accumulation can cause a cyst or abscess.

Anatomy of the vagina (2)
Identifying a bartholin gland cyst (3)

Treatment:
The mainstay of management is incision and drainage with insertion of a ward catheter. The ward catheter allows the cyst to continue to drain and allow re-epithelization of the Bartholin gland allowing the duct to stay patent in future.

Indications:
Presence of an uncomplicated Bartholin’s cyst.

Contraindications:
Latex allergy – the ward catheter is made with latex.

Materials:
Alcohol swabs or other solution to clean the area.
Sterile gloves
Local anesthetic
Scalpel with an 11 blade
Gauze (+++)
Haemostat to breakup loculations
Culture swab
Ward Catheter
Syringe filled with H2O to fill the ward catheter.

Procedure

  1. Sterilize area with sterilizing solution.
  2. Inject local anesthetic in to the area that you are going to stab for the incision ~1-3cc.
  3. Stab the cyst or abscess. Make the incision about 5mm big and 1.5cm deep. Too big an incision could cause the ward catheter to fall out.
  4. Drain the cyst/abscess and breakup any loculations with the haemostat.
  5. Place the ward catheter into the incision and inflate with 2-3cc of water.
  6. Tuck the end of the ward catheter in to the vagina to minimize discomfort.
Technique for insertion of word catheter (4)

Follow up:
Pelvic rest for the duration of the time the ward catheter is in place.
Sitz baths and mild analgesia (Tylenol/Advil)

Duration of ward catheter placement is on average four weeks.

If the ward catheter falls out prior to the tract being re-epithelialized or the cyst or abscess remains the patient may need another placement of the ward catheter or follow up marsupialization procedure (obstetrics). If the area looks well healed, the ward catheter can be kept out.

Role of antibiotics:
In uncomplicated skin abscesses there has been no benefit shown from antibiotic treatment. Using an antibiotic without and I and D will not heal the Bartholin glad cyst.

Antibiotics indicated in:
High risk of complicated infection – surrounding cellulitis, pregnancy, immunocompromised.
Culture positive MRSA
Signs of systemic infection

Bottom Line:

  1. Ward catheter placement is essential if you are going to drain a Bartholin’s abscess. If you don’t the patient may loose patency of the duct which could have long term consequences such as dyspareunia.
  2. Antibiotics alone will not cure a Bartholin’s abscess. Only indicated in limited situations.

References

  1. Uptodate: Bartholin gland masses: Diagnosis and Management https://www.uptodate.com/contents/bartholin-gland-masses-diagnosis-and-management?search=bartholin%20cyst&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~10&usage_type=default&display_rank=1
  2. Bartholin Gland Cysts: https://www.health.harvard.edu/a_to_z/bartholins-gland-cyst-a-to-z
  3. Bartholin Gland Cysts: https://www.merckmanuals.com/en-ca/home/women-s-health-issues/noncancerous-gynecologic-abnormalities/bartholin-gland-cysts
  4. Bartholin Gland Abscess or Cyst Incision and Drainage: https://accessemergencymedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=683&sectionid=45343783

Continue Reading