RCP – the “Easy IJ”

The “easy IJ”, a quick solution for difficult intravenous access?

Resident Clinical Pearl (RCP) – September 2017

Kavish Chandra, R3 FMEM, Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick

Reviewed by Dr. David Lewis

The importance of intravenous (IV) access is something seared in the mind of every practicing emergency department physician. Over the years, central intravenous access for difficult IV access has been obviated by the intraosseous drill and line. Furthermore, we just see and do less central IV lines. The likely reasons for this are that running vasopressors in peripheral intravenous (IV) lines is becoming more accepted as well as the increased time associated with placing a fully sterile central line (draping, etc.) as well as the risks of the over-the-wire procedure (infection, deep vein thrombosis, cardiac arrhythmias).

Enter the internal jugular vein catheterization using a peripheral IV catheter1, which is placed under a limited sterile environment. Is the 5 minutes to establish access that “easy” when peripheral access and external jugular catheterization has failed?

The materials required:

  1. US machine with high-frequency linear transducer probe
  2. Chlorhexidine swab
  3. 4.8-cm, 18-gauge single lumen catheter
  4. Two bio-occlusive adherent dressings
  5. Sterile ultrasound jelly
  6. A loop catheter extension
  7. A saline flush

Figure 1. Visual diagram of required materials for the “easy IJ”, adapted from Moayedi et al. (2016).

 

The steps:

  • Place your patient in the Trendelenburg position or instruct them to perform a Valsalva maneuver
  • The needle is inserted into the skin at approximately 45 degrees
  • Ultrasound is used to confirm real-time placement out of plane, followed by in-plane visualization to see the catheter in the vessel lumen
  • See this video for a demonstration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjSmbUWXznY

 

 

 

What does the evidence say2?

  • When studied in stable emergency department patients when peripheral or external jugular venous access was unsuccessful, the success rate of this procedure was 88% (95% CI 79-94)
  • The mean time to procedure completion was 4.4 minutes (3.8-4.9)
  • In 83 access attempts, there were no cases of pneumothorax, infection or arterial puncture
  • There was a 14% loss of IV patency immediately after insertion
  • Painful? Don’t forget, these lines were placed without local anesthesia; however, the mean pain score was 3.9 out of 10 (3.4-4.5)

Practical considerations:

So will this technique change your practice? A few things to be aware of:

  • In obese patients, the target vessel will be inherently more difficult to visualize, as well as the catheter length in this study may not be long enough to ensure patency. The median BMI in the Moayedi et al. (2016) study was 27
  • Operator skill: the vast majority of lines were placed by clinicians experienced in ultrasound guided line placement. Success and time to placement may be increased as experience decreases
  • Will more definitive access be required? The catheters placed in this study were largely only used for 24 hours. This would certainly be more than sufficient during the treatment of an ED patient, but usage time increases, infection rates will likely increase
  • Will this line achieve the infusion rate you need? See this article on infusion rates of various IV catheters

 

The bottom line: the “easy IJ” is a rapid, effective and safe alternative to establish IV access in stable patients in whom peripheral and external jugular venous attempts have failed.

 

References

(1) Teismann NA, Knight RS, Rehrer M, Shah S, Nagdev A, Stone M. The ultrasound-guided “peripheral IJ”: internal jugular vein catheterization using a standard intravenous catheter. J Emerg Med 2013 Jan;44(1):150-154.

(2) Moayedi S, Witting M, Pirotte M. Safety and Efficacy of the “Easy Internal Jugular (IJ)”: An Approach to Difficult Intravenous Access. J Emerg Med 2016 Dec;51(6):636-642.

 

 

Continue Reading

PoCUS – Measurements and Quick Reference

Developed by Dr. Heather Flemming as part of her PG PoCUS Elective at SJRHEM.

A useful Point of Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) guide to common normal values, measurements, pathological values and quick reference tips. A pdf version is also provided in this post which can be downloaded, printed and attached to your ultrasound machine for easy access.

 

 

 


 


Download (PDF, 1017KB)

 

Continue Reading

SHoC blog from @CanadiEM

Social media site @CanadiEM recently featured the @CJEMonline @IFEM2 #SHoC Consensus Protocol, featuring authors from @SJRHEM among others.

So why do we need another ultrasound protocol in emergency medicine? RUSHing from the original FAST scan, playing the ACES, FOCUSing on the CAUSE and meeting our FATE, it may seem SHoCking that many of these scanning protocols are not based on disease incidence or data on their impact, but rather on expert opinion. The Sonography in Hypotension (SHoC) protocols were developed by an international group of critical care and emergency physicians, using a Delphi consensus process, based upon the actual incidence of sonographic pathology detected in previously published international prospective studies [Milne; Gaspari]. The protocols are formulated to help the clinician utilize ultrasound to confirm or exclude common causes, and guides them to consider core, supplementary and additional views, depending upon the likely cause specific to the case.

Why would I take the time to scan the aorta of a 22 year old female with hypotension, when looking for pelvic free fluid might be more appropriate? Why would I not look for lung sliding, or B lines in a breathless shocked patient? Consideration of the shock category by addressing the “4 Fs” (fluid, form, function, and filling) will provide a sense of the best initial therapy and should help guide other investigations. Differentiating cardiogenic shock (a poorly contracting, enlarged heart, widespread lung B lines, and an engorged IVC) in an elderly hypotensive breathless patient, from sepsis (a vigorously contracting, normally sized or small heart, focal or no B lines, and an empty IVC) will change the initial resuscitation plan dramatically. Differentiating cardiac tamponade from tension pneumothorax in apparent obstructive shock or cardiac arrest will lead to dramatically differing interventions.

SHoC guides the clinician towards the more likely positive findings found in hypotensive patients and during cardiac arrest, while providing flexibility to tailor other windows to the questions the clinician needs to answer. One side does not fit all. That is hardly SHoCing news. Prospective validation of ultrasound protocols is necessary, and I look forward to future analysis of the effectiveness of these protocols.

References

Scalea TM, Rodriguez A, Chiu WC, et al. Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST): results from an inter- national consensus conference. J Trauma 1999;46:466-72.

Labovitz AJ, Noble VE, Bierig M, Goldstein SA, Jones R, Kort S, Porter TR, Spencer KT, Tayal VS, Wei K. Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2010 Dec 31;23(12):1225-30.

Hernandez C, Shuler K, Hannan H, Sonyika C, Likourezos A, Marshall J. C.A.U.S.E.: cardiac arrest ultra-sound exam – a better approach to managing patients in primary non-arrhythmogenic cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2008;76:198–206

Atkinson PR, McAuley DJ, Kendall RJ, et al. Abdominal and Cardiac Evaluation with Sonography in Shock (ACES): an approach by emergency physicians for the use of ultrasound in patients with undifferentiated hypotension. Emerg Med J 2009;26:87–91

Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, Mandavia D. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in Shock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2010;28:29 – 56

Jensen MB, Sloth E, Larsen KM, Schmidt MB: Transthoracic echocardiography for cardiopulmonary monitoring in intensive care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004, 21: 700-707.

Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, Noble VE, Nomura JT, Theodoro D, Woo M, Atkinson P, Blehar D, Brown SM, Caffery T. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016 Dec 31;109:33-9.

Milne J, Atkinson P, Lewis D, et al. (April 08, 2016) Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest (SHoC): Rates of Abnormal Findings in Undifferentiated Hypotension and During Cardiac Arrest as a Basis for Consensus on a Hierarchical Point of Care Ultrasound Protocol. Cureus 8(4): e564. doi:10.7759/cureus.564

Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest: The SHoC Consensus Statement

Continue Reading

IFEM Consensus Statement – SHoC – PoCUS use in Undifferentiated Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest

International Federation for Emergency Medicine Consensus Statement: Sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest (SHoC): An international consensus on the use of point of care ultrasound for undifferentiated hypotension and during cardiac arrest.

Paul Atkinson, MB, MA*†; Justin Bowra, MB‡§; James Milne, MD¶; David Lewis, MB*†; Mike Lambert, MD**; Bob Jarman, MB, MSc†††‡‡; Vicki E. Noble, MD§§¶¶; Hein Lamprecht, MB***; Tim Harris, BM†††‡‡‡; Jim Connolly, MB†† on behalf of the International Federation of Emergency Medicine Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest working group: Romolo Gaspari, MD, PhD; Ross Kessler, MD; Christopher Raio, MD; Paul Sierzenski, MD; Beatrice Hoffmann, MD; Chau Pham, MD; Michael Woo, MD; Paul Olszynski, MD; Ryan Henneberry, MD; Oron Frenkel, MD; Jordan Chenkin, MD; Greg Hall, MD; Louise Rang, MD; Maxime Valois, MD; Chuck Wurster, MD; Mark Tutschka, MD; Rob Arntfield, MD; Jason Fischer, MD; Mark Tessaro, MD; J. Scott Bomann, DO; Adrian Goudie, MB; Gaby Blecher, MB; Andrée Salter, MB; Michael Rose, MB; Adam Bystrzycki, MB; Shailesh Dass, MB; Owen Doran, MB; Ruth Large, MB; Hugo Poncia, MB; Alistair Murray, MB; Jan Sadewasser, MD

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine (CJEM) 

The International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) Ultrasound Special Interest Group (USIG) was tasked with development of a hierarchical consensus approach to the use of point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) in patients with hypotension and cardiac arrest.

The IFEM USIG invited 24 recognized international leaders in PoCUS from emergency medicine and critical care to form an expert panel to develop the sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest (SHoC) protocol. The panel was provided with reported disease incidence, along with a list of recommended PoCUS views from previously published protocols and guidelines. Using a modified Delphi methodology the panel was tasked with integrating the disease incidence, their clinical experience and their knowledge of the medical literature to evaluate what role each view should play in the proposed SHoC protocol.

Consensus on the SHoC protocols for hypotension and cardiac arrest was reached after three rounds of the modified Delphi process. The final SHoC protocol and operator checklist received over 80% consensus approval. The IFEM-approved final protocol, recommend CoreSupplementary, and Additional PoCUS views. SHoC-hypotension core views consist of cardiac, lung, and inferior vena vaca (IVC) views, with supplementary cardiac views, and additional views when clinically indicated. Subxiphoid or parasternal cardiac views, minimizing pauses in chest compressions, are recommended as core views for SHoC-cardiac arrest; supplementary views are lung and IVC, with additional views when clinically indicated. Both protocols recommend use of the “4 F” approach: fluidformfunctionfilling. An international consensus on sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest is presented. Future prospective validation is required.

Download (PDF, 1.2MB)

Continue Reading

Resident Clinical Pearl – A New Focus for PoCUS

A New Focus for PoCUS

Elective Resident Clinical Pearl – December 2016

Heather Flemming, PGY4 Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick

Reviewed by Dr. David Lewis

 

A 70 year old female presents to the emergency department with central abdominal pain and one episode of vomiting.  Her vital signs are stable, but she appears uncomfortable.

You bring the ultrasound machine to the bedside to assess her abdominal aorta. Your exam is challenged by the presence of bowel gas, causing scattering of your ultrasound beam, but is ultimately negative for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. You note that the patient has a midline scar, which she states is from a remote hysterectomy. With increased suspicion for bowel obstruction, you move the curvilinear probe across the abdomen and generate the following images: (Video Below)

The images demonstrate dilated loops of bowel and alternating peristalsis (a ‘to and fro movements’ of bowel contents). This confirms your suspicion for a small bowel obstruction (SBO).

 

Discussion:

Bedside ultrasound is a useful tool in evaluating any patient with abdominal pain, and has shown to be more sensitive and more specific than abdominal xray in diagnosing SBO1. Additional advantages of ultrasound include lack of radiation to the patient, bedside availability and potential to improve ED flow2. Treatments, such as nasogastric tube insertion, and early consultation to general surgery can be expedited by rapid identification. In individuals with recurrent sub-acute SBO, PoCUS may become the investigation of choice, reducing radiation exposure for this group of patients.

 

Pearls for performing a bedside ultrasound for SBO:

Multiple regions of the abdomen should be assessed, including the epigastrium, bilateral colic gutters, and suprapubic regions2. (Image 2).

Image 2 (overlapping survey of all quadrants)

 

Typical SBO ultrasound finding include:

  • ≥3 bowel loops dilated >25mm (Measurements taken at 90° to bowel wall)
  • Transition point – dilated peristalsing small bowel visualized adjacent to non-peristalsing collapsed bowel
  • Increased intraluminal fluid
  • Abnormal peristalsis: Hyperdynamic, alternating or absent peristalsis
  • Abdominal free fluid may also be present

 

Credit: ACEP.org

 

References

  1. Jang, Timothy B. Schindler, Danielle. Kaji, Amy H. Bedside ultrasonography for the detection of small bowel obstruction in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2011 28:676-678.
  2. Chao, Gharahbaghian. Tips and Tricks: Clinical Ultrasound for Small Bowel Obstruction – A Better Diagnostic Tool? https://www.acep.org/content.aspx?id=100218
  1. http://www.emdocs.net/ultrasound-small-bowel-obstruction/
  1. A video on Ultrasound in Small Bowel Obstruction by the Academy of Emergency Ultrasound can be found here: https://vimeo.com/69551555
Continue Reading

SJRHEM congratulates it’s two newest CEUS certified PoCUS practitioners

Dr Jacqueline Mackay and Dr Kyle McGivery have both completed their CEUS Core IP Certification.

Both recently assisted with the ECCU IP school here in Saint John. The ECCU IP school is now in it’s 3rd year and has given many physicians an opportunity to receive expert supervision in completing the required portfolio. Next year the ECCU IP school will be on April 29th 2017.

img_1146

 

Continue Reading

NB Emergency Medicine Research Day 2016

NB EM Research Rounds

5DN Amphitheatre, Saint John Regional Hospital

November 8th 2016

Research plays an important role in advancing everyday clinical practice. Questions such as what drug to order; do guideline improve outcomes; and how can we evaluate system processes that impact patient care. Over the past year, our Emergency Medicine Research Program has undertaken projects that attempt to answer such questions that impact our department. Today, you will hear about some of these projects and publications.

Today’s session provides medical learners the opportunity to present and receive feedback in a friendly format. We will present a prize to acknowledge the best research presentation. The other goal is to encourage formation of a collaborative research network in emergency departments throughout the province of New Brunswick.

Dr. Paul Atkinson MB MA FCEM CFEU Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine Dalhousie University
Horizon Health Network
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick

The program including all the abstracts can be viewed / downloaded below:

Download (PDF, 304KB)

 

Continue Reading

The Reason Study – How do the results affect care?

Earlier this month we reported the publication in Resuscitation Journal of the Reason study. Thanks to Dr. Atkinson (one of the authors of this study) for providing us with this explainer.

 


 

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Cardiac Arrest

Resuscitation Journal, Sept 2016

 

Absence of cardiac activity on point of care ultrasound during PEA and asystole, is associated with very poor survival rates.

 

Some clinicians use a lack of cardiac activity on ultrasound as a reason to terminate resuscitation efforts. We at the Saint John Regional Hospital Emergency Department (ED) participated in this prospective observational study at 20 EDs across North America. We assessed the association between cardiac activity on point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) during advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) and survival to hospital discharge in patients with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole. Patients were included if they received at least one round of ACLS resuscitation after the initial ultrasound. Patients were excluded if they presented with a shockable rhythm, had immediate return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), or the resuscitation was terminated immediately after the initial ultrasound.

Of 793 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest enrolled, 26% had ROSC, 14% survived to hospital admission, and 1.6% survived to discharge. Among 530 patients without cardiac activity on PoCUS, only 0.6% survived to discharge (compared with 3.8% of those with cardiac activity).

 

Cardiac activity on PoCUS and an initial rhythm of PEA on ECG were associated with ROSC (odds ratios, 3.0 and 2.8, respectively) and with survival to hospital admission (ORs, 3.6 and 2.1, respectively). Cardiac activity was associated with survival to discharge (OR, 5.7).

 

In patients with asystole, lack of cardiac activity had a sensitivity of 90% and predictive value of 99% for non–survival to hospital discharge (death).

 

PoCUS identified pericardial effusion in 34 patients and suspected pulmonary embolism in 15 who received thrombolytic therapy.

 

How does this affect care?

There is always an argument that the association between dismal survival and lack of cardiac activity is just a self-fulfilling prophecy, if absence of cardiac activity led to early termination of salvageable resuscitations. In this study, resuscitation had to continue until at least 2 scans were completed.

So, unless there are very special circumstances, such as significant hypothermia, or post defibrillation, it seems safe to terminate resuscitation for most patients with asystole on ECG and without cardiac activity on ultrasound.

 

References

Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, Noble VE, Nomura JT, Theodoro D, Woo M, Atkinson P, Blehar D, Brown SM, Caffery T, et al. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;109:33-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.018

 

Daniel M. Lindberg reviewing Gaspari R et al. Resuscitation 2016. Journal Watch. www.jwatch.org/na42452/2016/10/03/point-care-ultrasound-cardiac-arrest

Continue Reading

SJRHEM associated publication – The Reason Study

The Reason Study group, which included researchers from SJRHEM and involved may of SJRHEM physicians contributing data, has just published the results of the biggest prospective study to determine whether cardiac activity on ultrasound during ACLS is associated with improved survival.

The paper: Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest, was published in Resuscitation (http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.dal.ca/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.018) reported that “Cardiac activity on ultrasound was the variable most associated with survival following cardiac arrest. Ultrasound during cardiac arrest identifies interventions outside of the standard ACLS algorithm.”


Abstract

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound has been suggested to improve outcomes from advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), but no large studies have explored how it should be incorporated into ACLS. Our aim was to determine whether cardiac activity on ultrasound during ACLS is associated with improved survival.

Methods

We conducted a non-randomized, prospective, protocol-driven observational study at 20 hospitals across United States and Canada. Patients presenting with out-of-hospital arrest or in-ED arrest with pulseless electrical activity or asystole were included. An ultrasound was performed at the beginning and end of ACLS. The primary outcome was survival to hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation.

Findings

793 patients were enrolled, 208 (26.2%) survived the initial resuscitation, 114 (14.4%) survived to hospital admission, and 13 (1.6%) survived to hospital discharge. Cardiac activity on US was the variable most associated with survival at all time points. On multivariate regression modeling, cardiac activity was associated with increased survival to hospital admission (OR 3.6, 2.2–5.9) and hospital discharge (OR 5.7, 1.5–21.9). No cardiac activity on US was associated with non-survival, but 0.6% (95% CI 0.3–2.3) survived to discharge. Ultrasound identified findings that responded to non-ACLS interventions. Patients with pericardial effusion and pericardiocentesis demonstrated higher survival rates (15.4%) compared to all others (1.3%).

Conclusion

Cardiac activity on ultrasound was the variable most associated with survival following cardiac arrest. Ultrasound during cardiac arrest identifies interventions outside of the standard ACLS algorithm.

 


A very good critique of this paper has been published on the well-known EM Blog – St. Emlyns – JC: Is this the REASON to use USS in cardiac arrest? St.Emlyn’s

St. Emlyn’s Bottom Line: A lack of cardiac activity on initial USS is very probably associated with a worse prognosis. The role of USS in improving outcome as an intervention in cardiac arrest is less certain

 


We will be asking our Research Director (Dr Paul Atkinson), who was closely involved in this study, for his take on the results and how they should be interpreted/incorporated into practice. This has been posted here.

Continue Reading

SJRHEM Photo Contest 2016

We are very excited to announce the 2016 SJRHEM Photo Contest. This photography competition is open to all personel who work in the Saint John Regional Emergency Department in any role including clinical, admin, support, volunteers etc.

The themes of this competition mirror our mission statement and now include a new ‘open’ category:

CARING, RESPECT, INTEGRITY AND FAIRNESS

WHILE WORKING AS A PROGRAM TO ACHIEVE EXCELLENCE

Our aim is to improve the look and feel of our facility, for both staff and patients, by decorating the walls and corridors with high quality, thought inspiring photographic artwork that reflect the themes above.

CARING

Genuine concern for the well-being of others

caring


RESPECT

The dignity of all people

respect


INTEGRITY

Honest with strong moral principles

Dalai_Lama_1430_Luca_Galuzzi_2007crop


FAIRNESS

Making judgments that are free from discrimination

fairness


New OPEN CATEGORY

Landscapes, Architecture, People, Animals etc

2014-03-26 08.46.27

There will be a winner for each category and an overall winner. All will receive a framed print of their winning photo. The overall winner will be awarded the “Winner of the SJRHEM Photo Contest 2016” award.

The closing date for applications is October 10th 2016.

Click Here for More Information (Rules, Entry Forms etc)

Each entry must be accompanied by a separate application form and necessary consent forms.

Each entry must be emailed to :admin@sjrhem.ca  (subject: photo contest) or via online entry below

Continue Reading

Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest (SHoC): Rates of Abnormal Findings in Undifferentiated Hypotension and During Cardiac Arrest as a Basis for Consensus on a Hierarchical Point of Care Ultrasound Protocol

Abstract

Introduction

Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) has become an established tool in the initial management of patients with undifferentiated hypotension. Current established protocols (RUSH and ACES) were developed by expert user opinion, rather than objective, prospective data. PoCUS also provides invaluable information during resuscitation efforts in cardiac arrest by determining presence/absence of cardiac activity and identifying reversible causes such as pericardial tamponade. There is no agreed guideline on how to safely and effectively incorporate PoCUS into the advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) algorithm. We wished to report disease incidence as a basis to develop a hierarchical approach to PoCUS in hypotension and during cardiac arrest.

Methods

We summarized the recorded incidence of PoCUS findings from the initial cohort during the interim analysis of two prospective studies. We propose that this will form the basis for developing a modified Delphi approach incorporating this data to obtain the input of a panel of international experts associated with five professional organizations led by the International Federation of Emergency Medicine (IFEM). The modified Delphi tool will be developed to reach an international consensus on how to integrate PoCUS for hypotensive emergency department patients as well as into cardiac arrest algorithms.

Results

Rates of abnormal PoCUS findings from 151 patients with undifferentiated hypotension included left ventricular dynamic changes (43%), IVC abnormalities (27%), pericardial effusion (16%), and pleural fluid (8%). Abdominal pathology was rare (fluid 5%, AAA 2%). During cardiac arrest there were no pericardial effusions, however abnormalities of ventricular contraction (45%) and valvular motion (39%) were common among the 43 patients included.

Conclusions

A prospectively collected disease incidence-based hierarchy of scanning can be developed based on the reported findings. This will inform an international consensus process towards the development of proposed SHoC protocols for hypotension and cardiac arrest, comprised of the stepwise clinical-indication based approach of Core, Supplementary, and Additional PoCUS views. We hope that such a protocol would be structured in a way that enables the clinician to only perform views that are clinically indicated, which limits exposure to the frequent incidental positive findings that accompany the current “one size fits all” standard protocols.

See full article at www.cureus.com

Continue Reading