Approach to Inguinal and Femoral Hernias in the Emergency Department

Medical Student Pearl

Julia Short

Med 2

DMNB Class of 2025

Reviewed by Dr D Lewis

Copy Edited by Dr. J Vonkeman

PDF Download: EMSJ Approach to Inguinal and Femoral Hernias in the ED by JShort


Case

A 52-year-old male patient presents in the ER with a lump in their right groin. The lump protrudes when they cough and when laying on their left side, although it re-enters the abdomen on its own. You wonder if it could be a femoral or an inguinal hernia, and how to go about differentiating between the two.


Introduction

A hernia is defined as an organ, or part of an organ, that protrudes through the body wall in which it is normally contained. The etiology of a hernia can be due to congenital anatomical malformations or from acquired weakening of the body wall tissues. There are various subtypes of abdominal hernias, while groin hernias consist of inguinal and femoral hernias. Throughout their lifetime, males have a 27 to 43% chance of developing a groin hernia, while females have a 3 to 6% lifetime prevalence1. Although it is much more likely that a groin hernia is inguinal in nature (they account for 96% of groin hernias), it is clinically useful to identify and distinguish between the types of groin hernias. Additionally, there are important clinical features that must not be overlooked when characterizing a groin hernia.


Distinguishing inguinal from femoral hernias

An important landmark in determining the hernia origin is the inguinal ligament. Inguinal hernias protrude superior to the inguinal ligament, while femoral hernias present inferior to the inguinal ligament (Figure 1). This is because femoral hernias protrude from the femoral ring, located medial to the femoral vein. As a result, in males, femoral hernias will never course into the scrotum. Femoral hernias also present more lateral than inguinal hernias and may be difficult to differentiate from lymph nodes. Although they account for only 3% of all groin hernias, 40% of femoral hernias present as urgent due to bowel strangulation or incarceration1. Females are more likely to develop femoral hernias, while males are more likely to develop inguinal hernias.

Figure 1. Groin anatomy © 2023 UpToDate7


Distinguishing between direct and indirect inguinal hernias

Direct inguinal hernias originate medially, near the pubic tubercle and external inguinal ring. They protrude through Hesselbach’s triangle as a result of weakness in the floor of the inguinal canal. On exam, a bulge near the external (superficial) inguinal ring is suggestive of a direct inguinal hernia. In contrast, indirect inguinal hernias protrude near the midpoint of the inguinal ligament, at the internal (deep) inguinal ring (Figure 2). In males and females respectively, the internal inguinal ring is where the spermatic cord and round ligament exit the abdomen. A bulge in this area therefore suggests an indirect inguinal hernia. This type of hernia is the most common in all ages and sexes, accounting for approximately two thirds of all inguinal hernias2. In males, the indirect hernia often courses into the scrotum, which can be palpated if the patient strains or coughs. In contrast, it is rare for a direct hernia to course into the scrotum.

Figure 2. Anatomical comparison of direct and indirect inguinal hernias © 2020 Dr. Vaibhav Kapoor8


Clinical Approach

General considerations for investigating groin hernias include assessing the symptoms at presentation as well as any “red flag” physical findings. Patients commonly complain of dull or heavy types of discomfort when straining, which resolves when straining stops. Most groin hernias occur on the right side. Common physical findings include a bulge in the groin, which can indicate the type of hernia based on location relative to the inguinal ligament (Figure 3). However, in female or obese patients, the layers of abdominal wall may make the hernia more difficult to locate. In these cases, ultrasound or other imaging is needed to detect hernias. Clinicians should also determine if the hernia is reducible, or if the herniated bowel can be returned to the abdominal cavity when moderate pressure is applied externally.

Figure 3. Locations of femoral and inguinal hernias on examination © 2023 UpToDate7

 

Physical examination has a 76 to 92% sensitivity and 96% specificity for diagnosing groin hernias, although imaging may also be required1,2. Nausea, vomiting, fever, moderate-to-severe abdominal pain, localized tenderness, or bloating may indicate more sinister pathology such as bowel incarceration (when the hernia contents cannot return to the abdominal cavity), strangulation (when the blood supply to the involved bowel section is compromised) or necrosis.

Figure 5. CT images of A) femoral hernia (courtesy of Chris O’Donnell9 and B) inguinal hernia (courtesy of Erik Ranschaert10)


Management

Uncomplicated or asymptomatic hernias in males can be monitored through watchful waiting. Surgical repair is a definitive treatment for inguinal hernias and should be considered for symptomatic or complex hernias. If repair is needed for an uncomplicated inguinal hernia, a laparoscopic repair is recommended. Watchful waiting is not recommended for femoral hernias – these patients should have a laparoscopic repair (when anatomically feasible).

Manual reduction of the hernia can be performed by following the GPS Taxis technique. Taxis is a non-invasive technique for manual reduction of incarcerated tissues in a hernia to the original compartment5. “GPS” is an acronym to remind clinicians to be gentle, be prepared, and be safe when performing taxis5. Conscious sedation with intravenous diazepam and morphine is recommended for the procedure. Consider having an anesthetist present for the procedure if the patient is frail. Provide appropriate early resuscitation by monitoring vital signs, administering oxygen therapy and establishing IV access. Place the patient in Trendelenburg position. Begin the GPS Taxis technique by palpating the fascial defect around the base of the hernia and gently manipulating hernia contents back into the abdominal cavity. Use gentle manipulation pressure over 5-10 minutes until a gurgling sound is heard (indicating successful reduction of bowel).

 

Taxis guided by ultrasound may increase success rates for reduction.

https://sjrhem.ca/taxis-reduction-of-inguinal-hernia/

Figure 4. Colourized clip demonstrating PoCUS assisted Taxis reduction of an inguinal hernia11

 

It should be noted that the major contraindication to performing GPS Taxis is bowel strangulation within the hernia. A rare but serious complication of manual reduction is reduction en masse, when a loop of bowel remains incarcerated at the neck of the hernia after manual reduction6. This can lead to early strangulation, intestinal necrosis, sepsis, organ failure and death. Femoral hernias and indirect inguinal hernias are at higher risk of reduction en masse from manual reduction attempts.


References:

  1. UpToDate – Classification, clinical features, and diagnosis of inguinal and femoral hernias in adults
  2. Hammoud M, Gerken J. Inguinal hernia. StatPearls. 2022 Aug 15.
  3. UpToDate – Overview of treatment for inguinal and femoral hernia in adults
  4. Bates’ Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking, 12th ed. (pdf). Chapter 13: Male Genitalia and Hernias
  5. Pawlak M, East B, de Beaux AC. Algorithm for management of an incarcerated inguinal hernia in the emergency settings with manual reduction. Taxis, the technique and its safety. Hernia, 25, 1253-1258. 2021 May 25.
  6. Yatawatta A. Reduction en masse of inguinal hernia: a review of a rare and potentially fatal complication following reduction of inguinal hernia. BMJ Case Rep. 2017 Aug 7.
  7. UpToDate – Classification, clinical features, and diagnosis of inguinal and femoral hernias in adults
  8. Kapoor, V. Difference between and inguinal and umbilical hernia. 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.drvaibhavkapoor.com/difference-between-inguinal-and-umbilical-hernia.html
  9. Patel, MS. Femoral hernia. Radiopaedia. 2022 Dec 28. Retrieved from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/femoral-hernia
  10. Fahrenhorst-Jones, T. Inguinal hernia. Radiopaedia. 2022 Apr 12. Retrieved from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/inguinal-hernia
  11. PoCUS assisted Taxis reduction of an inguinal hernia. Video obtained courtesy of Dr. David Lewis.

Continue Reading

Headaches and Herpes Zoster

Headache and Herpes Zoster

Medical Student Pearl

 

James Tang

Dalhousie University Class of 2023

Reviewed by: Dr. Erin Slaunwhite

Copyedited by: Dr. Janeske Vonkeman


Case

Mr. H is a 57 yo gentleman who presents to the ED complaining of a 3-day history of headache. He describes a progressive worsening of a constant dull ache unilaterally above his left eye. It’s currently a 4-5/10 in severity and does not radiate. He has not had any nausea or vomiting, and no phonophobia but asks you to dim the lights in the room if that’s possible. He has no previous history of the same. He has not noticed any shooting pains associated with eating or drinking cold foods/liquids. He denies any associated autonomic symptoms on that side. Mr. H tells you he’s tried Tylenol and Advil at home and although it seemed to help a bit initially, the pain has continued to worsen over the last couple of days. He hasn’t noted any changes in the severity of his headache with physical activity.

Mr. H has no relevant past medical history and does not take any regular medications. He enjoys drinking 1-2 beers on the weekends, does not use cannabis, and has never used any other recreational drugs.

On physical exam, Mr. H appears his stated age and appears quite tanned from his job in construction. His vital signs are within normal limits. On close inspection, you make note of an area of erythematous macules and papules forming on his left forehead and extending 1-2 cm above and below his scalp line. The area is mildly tender to touch. His cranial nerve exam was otherwise normal. His remaining neuro exam, as well as head and neck, cardiac, respiratory, and abdominal exams were all normal.


A general approach to primary headache – Tension TIC TAC TOE

The International Headache Society (IHS) outlines specific diagnostic criteria for headache disorders within their International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD 3rd edition).1 Below is an abbreviated summary of the select common diagnoses that the ICHD discusses in much greater detail2-5:

Danger signs – features suggestive of secondary headache (e.g. space-occupying lesion, sub-arachnoid hemorrhage, cervical artery dissection, giant cell arteritis, infection, trauma, etc)2,4,5:

  • Systemic symptoms including fever, weight loss, progressive N/V
  • Neoplasm history
  • Neurologic deficit (including confusion, weakness, vision loss, numbness, impaired alertness, side locked headache)
  • Onset is sudden or abrupt (thunderclap)
  • Older age (> 50 yo)
  • Pattern change from previous headaches
  • Positional headache
  • Precipitated by Valsalva or exertion
  • Papilledema
  • Progressive headache and atypical presentations
  • Pregnancy or puerperium
  • Post-traumatic onset of headache
  • Pathology of the immune system such as HIV

Patients with danger signs suggestive of secondary headache should be considered for imaging. If a primary headache is suspected but imaging is performed for no other reason than reassurance, it can be detrimental to the patient if the results return incidental findings (e.g. vascular lesion) likely unrelated to the headache.


But our patient’s presentation doesn’t really seem to fit into any of these categories…


Herpes Zoster

In immunocompetent individuals, the diagnosis of herpes zoster is based solely on the clinical presentation: unilateral, usually painful vesicular eruption with a well-defined dermatomal distribution (see Figure 1). Prodromal symptoms include malaise, headache, photophobia, abnormal skin sensations, and occasionally fever. These symptoms may occur one to five days before the appearance of the rash. Age is the most important risk factor for the development of herpes zoster. A dramatic increase in the age-specific incidence of herpes zoster begins at approximately 50 years of age with 40% occur in people at least 60 years of age.6 It is estimated that approximately 50% of persons who live to 85 years of age will have had an episode of herpes zoster.6

Figure 1. Vesicular eruption in keeping with herpes zoster ophthalmicus with a crusted skin rash following the V1 dermatomal distribution and does not cross midline.7

Antiviral therapy is the first-line treatment and should be initiated within 72 hours of rash onset to increase the rate of healing, decrease the duration of acute herpes zoster, and decrease severity and pain. Ideally, initiation of antiviral therapy should be started during the pre-eruptive phase of herpes zoster, but often the diagnosis can only be confidently made once the distinctive rash presents.

See Table below for antiviral doses9:

Pain management

For acute herpes zoster, mild to moderate pain may be controlled with acetaminophen and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. For those with moderate pain not responding to acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, a short course of a short acting opioid such as hydromorphone or morphine could be considered or a course of corticosteroids. If the pain does not rapidly respond to opioid analgesics or if opioids are not tolerated, the addition of an adjunctive therapy should be considered including nortriptyline, gabapentin, or pregabalin. Despite these adjunctive therapies not having been extensively studied in patients with acute herpes zoster pain, they have evidence for other forms of nerve-type pain.8 The addition of corticosteroids to acyclovir decreases the pain of acute herpes zoster and speeds lesion healing and return to daily activities. Combination therapy with corticosteroids and antivirals should be considered in older patients with no contraindications.8

Theoretical models suggest that reducing pain during the acute phase of herpes zoster may stop the initiation of the mechanisms that cause chronic pain, thus reducing the risk of postherpetic neuralgia.8

 

Postherpetic neuralgia

Postherpetic neuralgia is the most common complication of herpes zoster.9 It occurs in ~30% of patients older than 80 years and ~20% of patients 60 to 65 years; it is rare in patients younger than 50 years.Postherpetic neuralgia may persist from 30 days to more than 6 months after the lesions have healed, and most cases resolve spontaneously.9 Although antiviral medications slow the production of the virus and decrease the viral load in the dorsal root ganglia, evidence showing that these medications alter the incidence and course of postherpetic neuralgia is inconsistent.8 The major risk factors for postherpetic neuralgia are older age, greater acute pain, and greater rash severity.8


Case conclusion

Mr. H’s headache did not fit into any specific category of headache as is often the case. Although he did meet the criteria for certain danger signs (e.g. age >50), imaging was forgone due to the finding of an erythematous maculopapular rash over his forehead. Mr. H’s rash followed the dermatomal distribution of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve and was highly suspicious of an early herpes zoster outbreak.

The patient was given a prescription for valacyclovir to take for 7 days with instructions to seek care if lesions break out close to his eye or his pain becomes unmanageable with over-the-counter analgesia. Herpes zoster opthalmicus can be a sight-threatening condition that requires close ophthalmology follow up if there is any concern of lesions near or in the eye or the patient has clinical signs or symptoms. Mr H inquired about getting the shingles vaccine and was advised to follow up with his family doctor to arrange this following resolution of his rash.


Key Takeaways

  • Have a structured approach to understanding the different classes of primary headaches
  • Know the danger signs that could be suggestive of a secondary headache
  • Clinical judgement should be prioritized in determining who to image
  • Herpes zoster is a clinical diagnosis in immunocompetent individuals
  • Appropriate pain management of acute herpes zoster and vaccination can help prevent chronic pain syndromes

 


References

  1. The International Classification of Headache Disorders – ICHD-3. Accessed June 24, 2022. https://ichd-3.org/
  2. Evaluation of Acute Headaches in Adults. Accessed June 24, 2022. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2001/0215/p685.html
  3. Primary care management of headache in adults Clinical Practice Guideline | September 2016 2 nd Edition. Published online 2016.
  4. Ponka D, Kirlew M. Top 10 differential diagnoses in family medicine: Headache. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53(10):1733. Accessed June 24, 2022. /pmc/articles/PMC2231438/
  5. Do TP, Remmers A, Schytz HW, et al. Red and orange flags for secondary headaches in clinical practice: SNNOOP10 list. Neurology. 2019;92(3):134-144. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000006697
  6. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of herpes zoster – UpToDate. Accessed June 24, 2022. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/epidemiology-clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis-of-herpes-zoster
  7. Darren Shu JT, Ghosh N, Ghosh S. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus. BMJ : British Medical Journal (Online). 2019;364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5234.
  8. Herpes Zoster and Postherpetic Neuralgia: Prevention and Management. Accessed June 24, 2022. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2011/0615/p1432.html
  9. Clinical Overview of Herpes Zoster (Shingles) | CDC. Accessed June 24, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/shingles/hcp/clinical-overview.html
Continue Reading